DigitalGovernment.org - Home of the Nat'l. Science Foundation Digital Government Research Program
menu 1
menu 2
menu 3
menu 4
   

dg.o Web


   

Computer Crime and
Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) 

 

Privacy Issues in the High-tech Context

star rule
  1. Law Enforcement Concerns Related to Computerized Data Bases
  2. Enforcing the Criminal Wiretap Statute
  3. Referring Potential Privacy Violations to the Department of Justice for Investigation and Prosecution
  4. Testimony on Digital Privacy

A. Law Enforcement Concerns Related to Computerized Data Bases
The Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the Department of Justice submitted comments in response to the request of the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") for comments on its workshop on Consumer Information Privacy and its Data Base Study. The Department is deeply concerned about the safety and security of American citizens. The Department is vigilant to take appropriate measures to guard their privacy while using all the resources at its disposal, including information resources, to investigate and prosecute violations of the federal criminal law. The comments are available via the link below:
B. Enforcing the Criminal Wiretap Statute
The Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section helps to protect the privacy of Americans by enforcing the criminal wiretap statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2511. One well-publicized interception involved a conference call in which the Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich participated. The couple that intercepted the call pleaded guilty on April 25, 1997, as is described in the press release below. On September 8, 1998, a Sheriff in North Carolina pled guilty today to wiretapping and recording a high school teacher's telephone calls, which the Sheriff intended to use to force the teacher out of his job. More information regarding this prosecution is available via the following link:
C. Referring Potential Privacy Violations to the Department of Justice for Investigation and Prosecution
Recently, Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder wrote a memo to the Inspector General community encouraging them to refer potential violations of federal privacy statutes to the Department of Justice for investigation and prosecution.  The letter provides an overview of federal privacy laws, including the Privacy Act, and explains the sentencing guidelines associated with particular violations.  The letter further directs that all suspected 1030(a)(2) offenses should be referred to the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section.
D.  Testimony on Digital Privacy

    On March 27, 2000, John T. Bentivoglio, Special Counsel for Health Care Fraud and Chief Privacy Officer at the U.S. Department of Justice, gave remarks on the prosecution of health care fraud and the protection of health care privacy on the Internet. His speech focused on the Federal government's fraud, consumer protection, and privacy protection efforts as they relate to the Internet healthcare industry.

 
    On May 27, 1999, the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Judiciary Committee, United States House of Representatives convened a hearing on medical records privacy.  John T. Bentivoglio, the Justice Department’s Chief Privacy Officer, testified before the committee on the subject of digital privacy in general.  The testimony outlines the Department’s privacy initiatives, including the work of the Privacy Council and comments on industry-led privacy safeguarding measures.  The testimony also addresses problems that result from failures to protect privacy, from Internet fraud to identity theft.  The testimony is linked below.
 

 Go to . . . CCIPS home page || Justice Department home page 


Updated page April 24, 2000
usdoj-crm/mis/mdf